- The California Energy Commission estimates that due to California’s steady per capita electricity consumption, California has avoided building 40 500MW power plants.
- At the California average price of 12 cents per kWh, the 40 avoided power plants are saving California $15 billion annually in avoided energy bills.[1]
|
California’s Energy Efficiency Policies
|
California’s Energy Efficiency History
Not only has California continuously ranked in the top two on the American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy’s (ACEEE) state energy efficiency scorecard, but its per capita electricity consumption has also remained relatively constant since the 1970’s, a period throughout which United States per capita electricity consumption has nearly doubled.[2] According to Art Rosenfeld, California’s energy efficiency progress can roughly be divided into a pie of thirds: one third climate, one-third electricity price and one-third policy. This claim is supported by a recent study which finds that 23% of the difference in electricity consumption per capita between California and the United States is due energy efficiency policies.[3]
From adopting the nation’s first appliance standards and building codes in the late 1970s to implementing a utility decoupling mechanism, California has established energy efficiency as the highest priority resource in meeting energy demand. This, along with adopting a long term energy efficiency strategic plan, has allowed California to lead the way in implementing effective energy efficiency policies.
|
Energy Efficiency Savings
Source: Martinez, Wang, and Chou, p.2. |
California Energy Crisis: Utility Investment
A pivotal moment for energy efficiency in California was the 2000-2001 energy crises that caused rolling blackouts throughout the state. After the energy crisis, annual investment in energy efficiency through utility budgets more than tripled from $210 million in 1998 to over $1 billion in 2008.[4] In 2009, the California Public Utility Commission (CPUC) approved the largest ever ratepayer funding for energy efficiency at $3.1 billion for the three-year cycle (2020-2012).[5] By 20011, electric efficiency program budgets represented more than 3% of California utilities’ revenues, and in the previous year, net incremental electricity savings represented almost 2% of utility retail electricity sales, both signifying much larger percentages than the average state. [6]
[1] Art Rosenfeld personal communication, November 5, 2012.
[2] Sudarshan, Anant and James Sweeney, “Deconstructing the Rosenfeld Curve: Understanding California’s Low Per Capita Electricity Consumption,” Stanford University, September 30, 2008, http://www.stanford.edu/group/peec/cgi-bin/docs/modeling/research/Decons....
[3] Ibid.
[4] Martinez, Sierra, Devra Wang, and James Chou, “California Restores its Energy Efficiency Leadership,” Natural Resources Defense Council, p.3, March 2010,http://docs.nrdc.org/energy/files/ene_10030901a.pdf.
[5] Rosenfeld, Arthur, “California Enhances Energy Efficiency,” 2011, https://sites.google.com/a/lbl.gov/cool-white-planet/.
[6] Foster, Ben et al, “2012 State Energy Efficiency Scorecard,” American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, p.31, October 2012, http://aceee.org/research-report/e12c.
Alliance Policy Interns Christina Ospina and Jen Richmond for their invaluable help in the crafting of this one pager.
