Search
 
information for
Email Newsletter Subscription
Sign up to receive Alliance to Save Energy newsletters!

act now

Motivating Business Leaders to Improve Profitability Through Energy Efficiency

The Executives for Energy Efficiency project, initiated in January 2003 and culminating its first phase in July 2003, is a New York state-based study of corporate receptiveness to energy efficiency implementation. The mission of this project is to develop a strategy that will “motivate New York business leaders to improve business performance through energy efficiency.” This project is coordinated by the New York State Energy Research & Development Authority, the U.S. Department of Energy, and the Alliance to Save Energy. Download the Report

This effort secured the advice and direction of a Steering Committee of business stakeholders from New York State. Through a series of meetings, discussions, and case study analyses, this project articulated a set of common hurdles to the implementation of energy efficiency initiatives. These hurdles are listed in the table (below). Each hurdle is defined by a business issue, presented here with a suggested strategy for overcoming that hurdle. In this analysis, the business issues include tariff concerns, the organizational design and pursuit of efficiency initiatives, and the cost-benefit and risk perceptions associated with project evaluation.

HURDLES TO BUSINESS ENERGY EFFICIENCY
Segment Defining Business Issue Critical Success Factor Stragegy or Approach
1 Lacks organizational stability Needs management stability, vision, champion Ensure success by screening early program participants
2 Investment bias for core business Responsive only to episodic energy crises Step up program media/outreach during crises
3 Fixation on energy PRICE; oblivious to EXPENSE Lowering of energy prices/tariffs “Risk buster” tariff for qualified projects
4 Lacks technical appreciation Needs case studies, proven precedents Establish cadre of demonstration providers
5 Defers to production/business climate risks Needs metering, documented hard data Coalitions of first-movers to pool data, risk
6 Jaded by energy “snake oil” from the past Secure sponsors/providers with prestige State to pre-qualify energy service companies (ESCOs), architectural & engineering consultants, and similar service providers
7 Conservative capital investment criteria Availability of guarantees and financing Apply SBC funds to debt pools, guarantees, tax credits
8 Sensitive to fuel price/tariff risk Ensure tariff/price stability “Risk buster” tariff for qualified projects
9* Company compelled to adopt energy efficiency Company edict, vision, or culture paves the way Recognize, award, and promote to industry peers
SOURCE: Executives for Energy Efficiency Steering Committee & Staff
*Segment 9 does not represent a “hurdle,” but recognizes the proactive pursuit of efficiency.


privacy statement | feedback | home